Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of the offense demands the most stringent punishment, contemplating the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been of the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be regarded, however, we've been crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy topic on the approval of your competent authority.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it is actually unclear how it applies to any given situation, generally rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances on the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
Reasonable grounds can be found within the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. However punishment from the alleged offence does not slide within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is in the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steering has long been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there might be just one or more judgments offered (or reported). Only the reason with the decision of the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all might be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A just isn't obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
Section 302 in the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
When the petitioner is just present in the place of occurrence without causing any injury to the deceased or PWs then in such circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided from the realized trial Court after recording on the evidence.
In a few jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the sensible application of this amendment and its prospective to protected financial interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the get more info grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
While in the United States, individuals are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their have can remember a single rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as possible, leading the court, not only to the case, but on the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.